On 
 March 8, 2013, the training workshop “Coastal Geomorphology, Sediment  
Transit and Their Integration into Biodiversity Conservation Planning in
  the Mekong Delta” was held in Ben Tre by WWF – Greater Mekong 
Programme  and Biodiversity Conservation Agency (BCA, MONRE). In the 
morning  session, Professor Edward J. Anthony[1]
  gave lectures on coastal geomorphology and impacts of hydropower dams 
 on coastal areas (Mekong Delta as a case study). In the afternoon  
session, Mr. Ngo Xuan Quy (BCA) gave an overview on biodiversity in the 
 Mekong Delta and Ms. Tran Thi Mai Huong (WWF Vietnam) gave a brief  
introduction to ecosystem-based approaches to climate change. The  
workshop ended with the plenary discussion and conclusion.
1. Introduction to coastal geomorphology and coastal evolution
Sediment
  sources for coasts are from land (90%, mainly from river catchments), 
 seabed, from the coast itself (coastal erosion), from marine and 
coastal  plants and animals (corals, mangroves, salt marshes). 
Sediment
  types can be boulders, blocks at high energy coasts (brought by  
tsunamis, extreme storms), gravel at high-energy-coasts in temperate to 
 high latitude coasts, and sand or mud at all climate settings, but  
dominant in tropical settings due to chemical weathering.
There
  are erosional coasts (rocky coasts, cliffed coasts) and  
depositional/alluvial coasts (beaches, sandflats, mudflats, salt  
marshes, mangroves). Depositional coasts can become erosional in case of
  deficient sediment supply.
The
  energy sources for coasts are waves, tides, currents, wind flows, 
river  flows, freshwater – saltwater interactions, exceptional events 
(storms,  tsunami, earthquakes, landslides, volcanoes, etc) and also 
impacts of  direct and indirect human interventions.
Longshore
  drift is a fundamental coastal process enabling sediment transport 
from  sources (notably river mouths) to the rest of the coast. Although 
 longshore sediment drift is essentially due to waves obliquely  
approaching the shore, this transport can also be generated by tidal  
currents and wind stress, especially where mud is available.
Sediment
  gain relates to coastal advance (accumulation, progradation) while  
sediment loss relates to coastal retreat (erosion). Sediment losses can 
 be caused by perturbation of river sediment supply such as forestation,
  land use changes, dams, climate change, perturbation of longshore 
drift  such as ports, coastal defence works, or extreme storms and 
tsunamis.  Low eroding coasts are likely to be strongly impacted by sea 
level rise.
Estuaries are commonly net sediment sinks. High river flow, and ebb-dominated tidal flows, can lead to sediment transport from the estuary to the sea. The supply of sediment to coasts by rivers has, however, been strongly affected by humans through:
-       modification
  of catchment characteristics such as vegetation cover and soils mainly
  related to agriculture, mining, road construction, settlements;
-       river
  bank and channel engineering works, including waterway diversions,  
aimed at stabilizing flow, controlling floods and enhancing navigation;
-       and especially through dams and reservoirs for water storage, water control, hydroelectricity, irrigation. 
The
  sediment input to the floodplains during the annual flood plays a  
crucial role in terms of nutrient supply to agriculture. Sedimentation  
in floodplain plays a key role for the economic and ecological  
sustainability of low lying deltas. Its values can be acknowledged for  
nutrient input for agriculture, but also in terms of compensation for  
delta subsidence and sea level rise.
The transition from the river to the coast involves complex interactions between sea, coastline and land.
 Humans
  have increased the sediment transport by global rivers through soil  
erosion by 2.3 ± 0.6 billion metric tonnes per year, but yet reduced the
  flux of sediment reaching the world's coasts by 1.4 ± 0.3 billion  
metric tonnes per year because of retention within reservoirs. Over 100 
 billion metric tonnes of sediment are now sequestered in reservoirs  
constructed largely within the past 50 years, especially in Africa and  
Asia (Syvitski et al., 2009).
Large-scale
  over-exploitation of riverbed sand, granulates together with dam  
construction all over the world have caused significant reduction of  
suspended sediment discharge which in turn can result in widespread  
coastal retreat. Engineering of delta shoreline for reclamation purposes
  can also reduce sediment supply to the coast. Moreover, river flow  
declines after dam construction.
Widespread erosion of the Mekong delta shoreline
Existing
  and planned mainstream dams in China would have large impacts in terms
  of decreasing sediment, given that more than 60% of the Mekong’s  
suspended sediment load originates from this part of the river. Models  
project that at least 50% of total basin sediment load will be trapped  
annually by the Chinese dams. Proposed dams in the lower Mekong would  
trap even more sediment, with substantial negative impacts expected in  
Cambodia and parts of the Mekong Delta in Vietnam.
Delta
  shoreline status shows that erosion dominates with more than 75% of 
the  Mekong delta shoreline in erosion. Erosion rates of up to 10 
m/year.  Erosion is severe along the muddy wave-tide-dominated coast 
southwest of  the delta mouths and most severe along north Ca Mau and 
south Bac Lieu  provinces. Erosion ‘hot front’ appears to be migrating 
southwest. 
Future
  stability of the Mekong delta shoreline and assurance of the 
continuity  of its ecosystem services will strongly depend on dam 
effects on the  sediment balance, in a context of exacerbated 
vulnerability from  sea-level rise and delta sinking.
 2. Biodiversity conservation in the Mekong Delta
   
  
The national policy for adaptation to climate change requires assessment
  of climate change impacts to related aspects, including biodiversity. 
 The draft national strategy on biodiversity conservation recognises  
climate change as one of the threats to biodiversity and suggests  
actions for biodiversity conservation in the context of climate change.
Planning
  is considered as a useful tool to conserve and identify priority zones
  for conservation, particularly relevant in the context of climate  
change. Among 12 provinces in the Mekong Delta, Soc Trang, Ben Tre and  
Ca Mau have developed their biodiversity conservation planning.
3. Introduction to ecosystem based approaches to climate change
An 
 ecosystem approach is a strategy for the integrated management of land,
  water and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable 
 use in an equitable way. Mainstreaming an ecosystem based approach to  
biodiversity conservation plan is crucial. 
Ecosystems
  provide a variety of services to people and economies that range from 
 provisionary services such as water and food to regulatory services 
such  as regulating local climate. Ecosystem-based approaches 
address  the crucial links between climate change, biodiversity, 
ecosystem  services and sustainable resource management which have the 
potential to  simultaneously contribute to the avoidance and reduction 
of greenhouse  gas emissions while maintain and increase resilience, 
reduce  vulnerability of ecosystems and people, help to adapt to climate
 change  impacts, improve biodiversity conservation and livelihood 
opportunities  and provide health and recreational benefits. 
Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA)
  is the use of biodiversity and ecosystem services as part of an 
overall  adaptation strategy to help people to adapt to the adverse 
effects of  climate change.
Ecosystem based mitigation (EbM) is the use of natural ecosystems as the major carbon stores and sinks to mitigate the causes of climate change  (mitigating and reducing GHG emissions from energy production or land use changes). 
Final
  decision of using one approach instead of the other one needs to be  
carefully weighted, considering local situations and scientific  
evidences, since in many cases the best strategy might be the  
combination of the two. It may be appropriate to combine EBA and  
infrastructure solutions in some cases. 
In the tentative 
agenda, the half-day fieldtrip on March 9 was supposed to visit the 
erosion site in Ben Tre. However, since they could not get permission 
for the two foreign experts (Prof. Edward Anthony and Dr. Marc Goichot, 
senior adviser of WWF), the plan was changed to visit Vam Ho Bird 
Sanctuary and the Ba Lai sluice gate.
Vam Ho has long 
become a favourite destination for many animals, especially birds. Vam 
Ho Bird Sanctuary is home to thousands of storks, herons and other types
 of bird. We arrived at the entry to Vam Ho Bird Sanctuary but could not
 move deeper inside the forest. Again unfortunately, the visit to Vam Ho
 Bird Sanctuary had to cancell for safety reason because of huge amount 
of mosquitos and because people were not well prepared (wearing shorts).
 
On the way back, 
we had a quick look at the Ba Lai sluice gate, which was built in 2000 
and has been operated since 2002. The aim of this Ba Lai sluice gate 
construction is to serve for salinisation prevention, freshwater 
retention, flooding drainage and soil reclamation. However, currently 
salinization, reduction of sediment, erosion at the two banks of the 
estuary are some problems in the area. 
Some key remarks at the plenary discussion
·         Dams
  construction and overexploitation of sand cause sediment deficits 
which  in turn affects significantly to coastal stability because this 
creates  more erosion downstream.
·         Reduction
  of sediment is just one legacy of dams construction, there are many  
more negative consequences, including the reduction of fish resources.
·         Mekong Delta are facing risks of erosion, shrinking and sinking.
·         Putting
  coastal barriers can affect downstream, especially for muddy coast.  
Therefore, we need to see the whole picture, looking the whole coast as a
  system.
·   “Hard”
  solutions or structural measures such as sea dyke are costly and only 
 create temporary sense of safety. After some years it can be collapsed 
 and washed away out to the sea. Moreover building sea dyke can block 
the  water exchange which is needed for mangroves (as mangroves also 
need  freshwater), resulting in mangrove death.
·       Ecosystem based approaches or “soft” measures are environmental friendly and can bring multiple benefits at the same time. 
·         Restoration
  of coastal mangroves can facilitate rehabilitation of biodiversity  
through creating habitats for aquatic resources and other animals,  
birds.
A
  video clip in Vietnamese made by VTV Can Tho about building 
wavebreaker  in Vam Ray, Hon Dat, Kien Giang province to reduce wave 
energy (reduce  63% wave energy) and stimulate sedimentation (deposition
 rate of 20 cm  sediment/year) for mangrove planting was shown. Results after 3 
years of  implementation this model (2010-2013) show that no more 
erosion,  increasing deposition, decreasing of salinization, restoration
 of  habitat with more aquatic resources, birds returning to the area.
*****
 My friend Cam Nhung, she is working for WWF. 
 Me at the Ba Lai sluice gate













 
No comments:
Post a Comment