Saturday, March 9, 2013

Coastal geomorphology, dam construction's impacts and ecosystem based approach




On March 8, 2013, the training workshop “Coastal Geomorphology, Sediment Transit and Their Integration into Biodiversity Conservation Planning in the Mekong Delta” was held in Ben Tre by WWF – Greater Mekong Programme and Biodiversity Conservation Agency (BCA, MONRE). In the morning session, Professor Edward J. Anthony[1] gave lectures on coastal geomorphology and impacts of hydropower dams on coastal areas (Mekong Delta as a case study). In the afternoon session, Mr. Ngo Xuan Quy (BCA) gave an overview on biodiversity in the Mekong Delta and Ms. Tran Thi Mai Huong (WWF Vietnam) gave a brief introduction to ecosystem-based approaches to climate change. The workshop ended with the plenary discussion and conclusion.
1. Introduction to coastal geomorphology and coastal evolution
Sediment sources for coasts are from land (90%, mainly from river catchments), seabed, from the coast itself (coastal erosion), from marine and coastal plants and animals (corals, mangroves, salt marshes).
Sediment types can be boulders, blocks at high energy coasts (brought by tsunamis, extreme storms), gravel at high-energy-coasts in temperate to high latitude coasts, and sand or mud at all climate settings, but dominant in tropical settings due to chemical weathering.
There are erosional coasts (rocky coasts, cliffed coasts) and depositional/alluvial coasts (beaches, sandflats, mudflats, salt marshes, mangroves). Depositional coasts can become erosional in case of deficient sediment supply.
 


The energy sources for coasts are waves, tides, currents, wind flows, river flows, freshwater – saltwater interactions, exceptional events (storms, tsunami, earthquakes, landslides, volcanoes, etc) and also impacts of direct and indirect human interventions.
Longshore drift is a fundamental coastal process enabling sediment transport from sources (notably river mouths) to the rest of the coast. Although longshore sediment drift is essentially due to waves obliquely approaching the shore, this transport can also be generated by tidal currents and wind stress, especially where mud is available.


Sediment gain relates to coastal advance (accumulation, progradation) while sediment loss relates to coastal retreat (erosion). Sediment losses can be caused by perturbation of river sediment supply such as forestation, land use changes, dams, climate change, perturbation of longshore drift such as ports, coastal defence works, or extreme storms and tsunamis. Low eroding coasts are likely to be strongly impacted by sea level rise.

Estuaries are commonly net sediment sinks. High river flow, and ebb-dominated tidal flows, can lead to sediment transport from the estuary to the sea. The supply of sediment to coasts by rivers has, however, been strongly affected by humans through:
-       modification of catchment characteristics such as vegetation cover and soils mainly related to agriculture, mining, road construction, settlements;
-       river bank and channel engineering works, including waterway diversions, aimed at stabilizing flow, controlling floods and enhancing navigation;
-       and especially through dams and reservoirs for water storage, water control, hydroelectricity, irrigation.
The sediment input to the floodplains during the annual flood plays a crucial role in terms of nutrient supply to agriculture. Sedimentation in floodplain plays a key role for the economic and ecological sustainability of low lying deltas. Its values can be acknowledged for nutrient input for agriculture, but also in terms of compensation for delta subsidence and sea level rise.




The transition from the river to the coast involves complex interactions between sea, coastline and land.
 Humans have increased the sediment transport by global rivers through soil erosion by 2.3 ± 0.6 billion metric tonnes per year, but yet reduced the flux of sediment reaching the world's coasts by 1.4 ± 0.3 billion metric tonnes per year because of retention within reservoirs. Over 100 billion metric tonnes of sediment are now sequestered in reservoirs constructed largely within the past 50 years, especially in Africa and Asia (Syvitski et al., 2009).
Large-scale over-exploitation of riverbed sand, granulates together with dam construction all over the world have caused significant reduction of suspended sediment discharge which in turn can result in widespread coastal retreat. Engineering of delta shoreline for reclamation purposes can also reduce sediment supply to the coast. Moreover, river flow declines after dam construction.
Widespread erosion of the Mekong delta shoreline
Existing and planned mainstream dams in China would have large impacts in terms of decreasing sediment, given that more than 60% of the Mekong’s suspended sediment load originates from this part of the river. Models project that at least 50% of total basin sediment load will be trapped annually by the Chinese dams. Proposed dams in the lower Mekong would trap even more sediment, with substantial negative impacts expected in Cambodia and parts of the Mekong Delta in Vietnam.
Delta shoreline status shows that erosion dominates with more than 75% of the Mekong delta shoreline in erosion. Erosion rates of up to 10 m/year. Erosion is severe along the muddy wave-tide-dominated coast southwest of the delta mouths and most severe along north Ca Mau and south Bac Lieu provinces. Erosion ‘hot front’ appears to be migrating southwest.
Future stability of the Mekong delta shoreline and assurance of the continuity of its ecosystem services will strongly depend on dam effects on the sediment balance, in a context of exacerbated vulnerability from sea-level rise and delta sinking.

2. Biodiversity conservation in the Mekong Delta
 
The national policy for adaptation to climate change requires assessment of climate change impacts to related aspects, including biodiversity. The draft national strategy on biodiversity conservation recognises climate change as one of the threats to biodiversity and suggests actions for biodiversity conservation in the context of climate change.
Planning is considered as a useful tool to conserve and identify priority zones for conservation, particularly relevant in the context of climate change. Among 12 provinces in the Mekong Delta, Soc Trang, Ben Tre and Ca Mau have developed their biodiversity conservation planning.

3. Introduction to ecosystem based approaches to climate change
An ecosystem approach is a strategy for the integrated management of land, water and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way. Mainstreaming an ecosystem based approach to biodiversity conservation plan is crucial.
Ecosystems provide a variety of services to people and economies that range from provisionary services such as water and food to regulatory services such as regulating local climate. Ecosystem-based approaches address the crucial links between climate change, biodiversity, ecosystem services and sustainable resource management which have the potential to simultaneously contribute to the avoidance and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions while maintain and increase resilience, reduce vulnerability of ecosystems and people, help to adapt to climate change impacts, improve biodiversity conservation and livelihood opportunities and provide health and recreational benefits.
Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) is the use of biodiversity and ecosystem services as part of an overall adaptation strategy to help people to adapt to the adverse effects of climate change.
Ecosystem based mitigation (EbM) is the use of natural ecosystems as the major carbon stores and sinks to mitigate the causes of climate change  (mitigating and reducing GHG emissions from energy production or land use changes).
Final decision of using one approach instead of the other one needs to be carefully weighted, considering local situations and scientific evidences, since in many cases the best strategy might be the combination of the two. It may be appropriate to combine EBA and infrastructure solutions in some cases.




Excursion on March 9, 2013


In the tentative agenda, the half-day fieldtrip on March 9 was supposed to visit the erosion site in Ben Tre. However, since they could not get permission for the two foreign experts (Prof. Edward Anthony and Dr. Marc Goichot, senior adviser of WWF), the plan was changed to visit Vam Ho Bird Sanctuary and the Ba Lai sluice gate.
Vam Ho has long become a favourite destination for many animals, especially birds. Vam Ho Bird Sanctuary is home to thousands of storks, herons and other types of bird. We arrived at the entry to Vam Ho Bird Sanctuary but could not move deeper inside the forest. Again unfortunately, the visit to Vam Ho Bird Sanctuary had to cancell for safety reason because of huge amount of mosquitos and because people were not well prepared (wearing shorts).


On the way back, we had a quick look at the Ba Lai sluice gate, which was built in 2000 and has been operated since 2002. The aim of this Ba Lai sluice gate construction is to serve for salinisation prevention, freshwater retention, flooding drainage and soil reclamation. However, currently salinization, reduction of sediment, erosion at the two banks of the estuary are some problems in the area. 

 


Some key remarks at the plenary discussion

·         Dams construction and overexploitation of sand cause sediment deficits which in turn affects significantly to coastal stability because this creates more erosion downstream.

·         Reduction of sediment is just one legacy of dams construction, there are many more negative consequences, including the reduction of fish resources.

·         Mekong Delta are facing risks of erosion, shrinking and sinking.

·         Putting coastal barriers can affect downstream, especially for muddy coast. Therefore, we need to see the whole picture, looking the whole coast as a system.

·   “Hard” solutions or structural measures such as sea dyke are costly and only create temporary sense of safety. After some years it can be collapsed and washed away out to the sea. Moreover building sea dyke can block the water exchange which is needed for mangroves (as mangroves also need freshwater), resulting in mangrove death.

·       Ecosystem based approaches or “soft” measures are environmental friendly and can bring multiple benefits at the same time.

·         Restoration of coastal mangroves can facilitate rehabilitation of biodiversity through creating habitats for aquatic resources and other animals, birds.

A video clip in Vietnamese made by VTV Can Tho about building wavebreaker in Vam Ray, Hon Dat, Kien Giang province to reduce wave energy (reduce 63% wave energy) and stimulate sedimentation (deposition rate of 20 cm sediment/year) for mangrove planting was shown. Results after 3 years of implementation this model (2010-2013) show that no more erosion, increasing deposition, decreasing of salinization, restoration of habitat with more aquatic resources, birds returning to the area.

 *****

 My friend Cam Nhung, she is working for WWF.




 Me at the Ba Lai sluice gate


Thursday, March 7, 2013

Mekong Environmental Symposium, March 2013


In the spirit of the United Nations’ International Year of Water Cooperation 2013, from March 5 to 7 in Ho Chi Minh city, the German Aerospace Center (DLR) organized the Mekong Environmental Symposium[1], bringing together over 300 stakeholders and scientists from 25 countries to discuss environmental issues challenging the Mekong River Basin. Flowing over 4800 km through six countries, the Mekong river has one of the world’s largest transboundary delta, which is home to over 70 million inhabitants, in which 60 million people live within the lower Mekong countries and 10 million residing in the upper Mekong (Yunnan Province, China).
On March 5, the first day of the symposium, in the morning session, there were welcome notes  of organizers, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), MOST, MONRE, MARD and country statements of Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar and China. In the afternoon, the German-Vietnamese WISDOM[2] project (2007-2013), a bilateral, multidisciplinary research was presented. The main project goal is to design and implement a comprehensive information system tool which supports regional government agencies in the Mekong Delta in their planning processes to develop the region and adapt to climate change. All of the results generated over the 6 years of the project, geodata, maps, research reports, legal document databases, additional literature, image galleries, etc. are available online to a broad audience.
During the symposium, there were also exhibition of many projects, organisations, displaying their posters, documents, flyers, brochures such as the AKIZ project, GIZ, German Red Cross (GRC), Sustainable Mekong Research Network (SUMERNET), IUCN Mangroves for the Future, Goethe Institute, Stockholm Environment Institute etc.
On the next two days of the symposium (March 6-7), parallel sessions of 12 topics below were presented:
·         Hydropower development and impacts on the river ecology
·         Hydropower development and impacts on the economy
·         Mekong Basin forest dynamics and REDD+
·         Mekong Basin land use (non-forest) dynamics
·         Mekong Basin hydrology and hydrography
·         Hazards and disaster risk reduction in the Mekong Basin
·         Mekong Basin aquatic ecology, biodiversity and water quality protection
·         Tonle Sap Lake: ecology, biodiversity and rural livelihoods
·         Mekong Delta: Climate change related challenges
·         Impacts of urbanization and industrialisation on agriculture and water resources
·         Collaboration platforms in basin management: Information Systems and Spatial Infrastructures
·         Capacity building, education and outreach
Key messages and lessons learned
1. Anthropogenic activities outweigh and exacerbate the effects of climate change. The Mekong River is under intense development pressure, with multiple upstream dams under construction and downstream dam proposals[3] that, in combination, would dramatically alter ecosystem and human livelihoods. The cumulative impacts of hydropower development are expected to modify the regime over the coming decades. Water level has been remarkably decreasing.
A major expansion of intense irrigated agriculture in the basin is also planned, which has the potential to further modify flows. Comparison between the soil erosion by change of land use and soil loss due to typhoon reveals that land use change has a stronger importance over a long-term period.
2. Hydropower development impacts – Interconnected drivers of change. The cumulative effects of the lower Mekong hydropower projects – if built, and together with existing Chinese dams, will transform the Mekong by altering natural flow patterns, disrupting fisheries and other ecosystem services, to the detriment of millions of people who depend on the river for their livelihoods.
Results indicate that trade-offs between hydropower production, irrigation and flood control are modest. Among others, displacement, land shortages, lack of livelihood opportunities, fisheries losses, flooding and erosion are the main negative impacts.
Altering natural flow regime: Dams would turn more than half of the length of the main river channel into reservoirs characterised by slow-moving water conditions, thereby increasing the risk of water-borne diseases. The dams also damage natural habitats and cause degradation of the environment.
Effect on water quality: Changing conditions of water in the reservoir subsequently affects both the quality of water in the reservoir and downstream as many heavy metal occurred. Domestic and industrial wastewater from a rapidly growing population will also combine with these developments to affect water quality in the Delta.
Risks to food security: Construction of dams would reduce yields of fish and other aquatic resources by 6-34% depending on the scenario considered. Regional supplies of fish and related products are likely to be significantly impacted by dams acting as barrier to fish migrations and sediment traps diminishing the transport of nutrient-rich sediments to coastal fisheries. Hydropower decreases the migrating fish due to reduce access to spawning grounds and rearing zones, and to cause mortalities or injuries.
Involuntary resettlement: Hydropower development alters local communities in many different ways, including changes in water access and use. It is a big concern for the affected communities as it makes them lose of their livelihoods and resources.
Risk of dam failure: Main severe accident risk of hydropower is the risk of dam failure which can make serious flood.
Our understanding of the Mekong ecosystem is far from complete. It was concluded that the immensity of risks was beyond the current capacities of regional governments to address, and recommended deferring all lower Mekong mainstream dam building for at least 10 years.
3. Transboundary problems need transboundary solutions. Given the transboundary nature of the Mekong River Basin, the challenges transcend the spheres of influence of individual Mekong riparian states. There are inextricable links between water, food, energy, and all the drivers of change in the countries that share the Mekong river. It will be necessary to strengthen Mekong governance and knowledge network across borders. The management of Mekong challenges can therefore only be successful if pursued at a transboundary governance level. A sincere and constructive dialogue is needed as well as a more informed and collaborative water governance by Mekong countries. Cooperation is mutually beneficial as it can enhance efficiency and equity.
4. To minimize the impact of hydropower dam on the affected community, well design of the hydropower scheme, good management of dam construction and well hydropower project operation should be applied. The multi-use of reservoir, particularly for irrigation, fishing and fish raising should be considered during design phase and applied during operation. Multiple use of the water of the reservoir would optimize the economic value of water as opposed to its existing single use. Multiple use of the water of the reservoir would provide not only greater economic benefits but would also entail a more equitable distribution of these benefits in favour of local rural communities. However, this would need a more coordinated water management mechanism among local authorities. Comparative analysis of trade-offs helps to build a more holistic understanding of livelihood changes due to hydropower development and provides new insight for appropriate intervention that integrates multiple water uses for decision-makers.
5. Hazards and disaster risk reduction in the Mekong Basin. While regular floods are not a threat but an opportunity for livelihoods and income generation, extreme flood events can pose considerable risks to the people living in the Deltas.
  • More climate risk investments such as early warning system, adaptation and preparedness are needed to minimize risk.
  • Proper river channel improvement leads to advantages not only for the navigation but also for extreme events mitigation.
Salinity related problems will increase in the coastal areas:
  • Rethink about adaptation measures including both structural and non-structural options instead of focusing on dyke constructions.
6. Sustainable natural resource management requires local participation and close monitoring. Training courses for stable alternative livelihood are necessary to reduce pressure on natural resources in the area. The participation from community and civil society should be encouraged and taken into account for preparing environmental impact assessment (EIA) and making decision of hydropower development.
7. Paying the forest for electricity. Forest conservation can reduce soil erosion, and therefore, efforts to maintain upstream forest cover within a watershed contribute to the economic life span of a hydropower facility. The cost of forest conservation can be viewed as an investment in hydropower and be financed via a Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) scheme.
8. The Participatory Social Return on Investment (PSROI). Adaptation to climate change has necessarily become an integral component of planning and policy decision making. Top down policies and cost estimates related to climate change adaptation frequently lack sufficient resolution for identifying realities and values at the community and household levels. Without local input, adaptation costing estimates may lead to misallocation of funds to interventions not identified as priorities to vulnerable communities. Community involvement in prioritizing and costing local adaptation interventions can be important for policy decisions and funding allocation, and can guide implementation and long term monitoring of impact.
The PSROI framework is developed to identify stakeholders’ priorities for adaptation and analyse the value of interventions from stakeholder perspectives. It is a pluralistic framework that focuses on local capacities and community strengths, instead of solely needs, when planning for resilience.
9. Transboundary flows – interesting concepts. Transboundary flows are flows that cross shared international borders. Four main types of transboundary flows are distinguished: resource flows refer to the movement of animals and natural resources (1); people flows (2); goods flows (3); and non-material flows such as symbolic transactions, in particular, of money, ideas and information (4). Those related to ideas, technical skills or culture have received less attention; they are more indirect but profound, influencing the evolution of other flows as they shape perceptions, beliefs and expectation. Transboundary flows are not independent of each other. They create opportunities, risks and burden for social development, economic growth and environmental sustainability.
Places are linked and transformed by flows. In the Mekong Region, improved transport infrastructure is increasing trade in agriculture and manufactured products. Advanced in communication and IT are also changing the way people perceive themselves and others, their aspirations and how they organise.

******


Stefanie - GIZ Bac Lieu

Hendrik and his friend from BTU Cottbus

Lisa from GIZ Bac Lieu presenting our topic: "Erosion protection through bamboo breakwaters: climate change adaptation in the Mekong Delta".

 Dr. Klaus


Dr. Harry and Nigel

Harry presenting the topic: "Challenges and opportunities for risk-adapted land-use planning in Ho Chi Minh City: Balancing rapid urban growth and resilient water management".


Joep presenting




  Me and colleagues from Hanoi at our GIZ stall in the symposium


 Talking after lunch

*****
 Group photo at the rooftop of the Intercontinental Asiana Hotel

 
References
The documents and video clips collected at the symposium can be download at the links below:
Abstract Volume: http://mekong-environmental-symposium-2013.org/frontend/file.php?id=3020&dl=1   
Presentations: http://mekong-environmental-symposium-2013.org/frontend/index.php?folder_id=317  
Photo Gallery of the Mekong Environmental Symposium:
https://picasaweb.google.com/102414143747684961201/MekongEnvironmentalSymposium2013
The Mekong movie[4]:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10206844/mekongmovie/Mekong_DVD.mp4 





[2] The WISDOM Project: http://www.wisdom.caf.dlr.de/
[3] During the foreseeable future (to 2030), additional 56 tributary dams and 11 mainstream dams may be constructed in the Lower Mekong Basin (LMB).
[4] The Mekong movie: Filmed in four countries, the documentary ‘Mekong’ includes footage of China’s Mekong (Lancang) dams and footage of the controversial Xayaburi dam in Laos. The film examines the issues of hydropower development and its impact on the lives of Mekong citizens.
More information on the documentary: http://www.mekongcitizen.org